Fossils & Geological Features

Fossils & Geological Features

Add a sighting Subscribe View significant View unverified

Fossils & Geological Features

Moderators

become a moderator

Announcements

Temporary disruption to attributes
Yesterday

There will be some temporary disruption to attributes when adding or editing sightings while we upgrade a complex part of the system.This may mean that some of the usual questions that are relevant to...

Continue reading

New feature: duplicate a sighting

Capital Ecology backs NatureMapr for 2026

NatureMapr integrates with Wildlife Insights for NSW based camera trap data

NatureMapr update

Discussion

RogerF wrote:
24 May 2025
Only 430 million years old
Trilobita (class) fossil
waltraud wrote:
22 May 2025
Trilobite....
Trilobita (class) fossil
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
22 May 2025
Thanks Waltraud
Brachiopoda (phylum) fossil
waltraud wrote:
21 May 2025
https://canberra.naturemapr.org/users/8083, to be honest I don't know. Both groups are bilateral symmetric and have species with similar looking shells; however, the mussels (bivalvia) have a right and left and the Brachiopodia have a upper and lower shell; I'm afraid without additional structural info it is hard to say. Given the richness of Brachiopodia in Canberra's fossil record in similar Silurian formation e.g. the mudstone at woolshed creek, I would opt for Brachiopodia; see https://artsandculture.google.com/story/a-c-t-fossil-emblem-geoscience-australia/cAWBTqZZczzjKA?hl=en
Brachiopoda (phylum) fossil
MichaelBedingfield wrote:
21 May 2025
Hi Waltraud. It looked like a bivalve from the photo, but happy to change to Brachiopodes if you think that's what it is.
Brachiopoda (phylum) fossil

Species Richness Score (SRS)

19

Top contributors

Top moderators

824,777 sightings of 22,593 species from 14,237 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
NatureMapr is developed and subsidised by at3am IT Pty Ltd and is proudly Australian made